Jinpan International 6k Preview

Jinpan International Ltd. (Nasdaq: JST) announced preliminary financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012.

Here are the numbers compared to a year ago same quarter:

Category Q2 2012 Q2 2011 % Gain/ (Loss)
Net sales 55.6 58.3 (4.6)
Gross Profit 14.5 22.2 (34)
Gross as % of Sales 26% 38.1%
Net Income 2.5 7.28 (65)
EPS .15 .45 (66)

 

Also, per the news release management has amended the 2012 outlook per the following:

  1. Net sales for 2012 to be US$ 219 to US$ 230 million or 0% to 5% growth over net sales in 2011 of US$ 219 million.
  2. Gross profit margin for 2012 is expected to be  approximately 33% of net sales, compared to gross profit margin in 2011 of 36.7% of net sales.
  3. Net income for 2012 is expected to experience a decrease of 15% to 20%, compared to US$ 23.8 million in 2011.

A Look at Management’s Statements.

The sales number reports from two segments, domestic (China) and international. Domestic sales grew to 50.8M from 46.1M the same quarter last year. International sales took a big hit, 4.8M compared to 12.2M from last year’s second quarter. This was attributed to “…a change in the design by our primary OEM customer of their wind power product(s), which resulted in a decrease in our international sales in the second quarter.

“Currently, we are waiting for our customer to provide new specifications, so we can make corresponding design changes to our cast resin transformer products and integrate our transformers into their newly designed wind power product(s).”  International OEM sales have been down for a three month period and Jinpan is still waiting for specifications from this customer. This may be a flag signaling strained customer relations.

Once these specifications are received, Jinpan will have to modify/redesign their product and have it re-qualified. I would expect this to take some time and possibly affect International sales for the remainder of this year. Management expects this also, “Even though we experienced slower sales to our primary OEM customer, we do expect a pick-up in orders from other OEM customers in the second half of 2012.” This has also exposed a weakness of dependence on one major OEM customer (a 60% decrease in this sales segment due to one customer). I would like to see management move to fix this weakness.

I sensed some hesitation by management about Domestic sales for the remainder of the year also, “We also experienced some weakness in domestic order flows in the second quarter due to a softer economic environment in China.” Domestic sales were actually up by 9.25% this quarter compared to last year, why the warning?

“We have backlog of approximately $113 million at the end of June 2012 and believe that approximately 80% to 90% of the backlog will be shipped in 2012”. I assume that 113M figure is a net sales number. 80% of that would be about 90.5M for the last half of the year in addition to incoming orders. Last year Jinpan had 130.75M revenue over the last half of the year.

The revised numbers for Net Sales predict 0-5% growth this year. Using the worst case scenario of 219M would require Jinpan to achieve Net Sales of 120.6M over the last two quarters. Again, Jinpan had about 130M over the last two quarters for 2011 so it is possible, even more so if the backlog is delivered as promised.

The Gross Margin reduction is not too much of a concern for me. Jinpan has averaged a 38% margin over the last ten years and been in the 33% range three of the same last ten. Also, the net income number if reduced by 20% would be 19M. This is still well above the ten year average of 12.6M and better than seven of the last ten.

Conclusion

“We believe the second half of 2012 will be stronger for our business than the first half.”

Jinpan has some work to do if it wants to be a ‘zero growth company’ this year. There have been some weaknesses exposed regarding reliance on a single customer and possibly customer relations/communications. Jinpan plans to release its second quarter earnings results and conduct an earnings conference call in mid-August. I look forward to seeing how management addresses these issues and handles the remainder of the year, it could reveal a lot about the quality of management.

First Impressions: Steady and Consistent EPS

“You never get a second chance to make a first impression.” – UNK.

There is no exception to this rule when it comes to investing in companies.

When searching for possible investment opportunities I use several tools to narrow down likely candidates.

First, I use a stock screen that is  an adaption of the 7 criteria set forth by Graham in The Intelligent Investor. Once I have established a list of companies that have met the criteria, I begin to look a little closer. This is where I formulate my first impression of a business.

Steady and Consistent EPS

As I winnow through the list of companies, I enter each of them into a spread sheet and I am met with a graphical display of the company’s Earnings per Share (EPS) from the last decade, like the one below:

 

 

 

 

Or, sometimes I may see one like this:

 

 

 

 

I have not disclosed the names of the companies yet, so as not to prejudice your impressions.

Graham calls for the defensive investor to require “Some earnings for the common stock in each of the past ten years.”  By itself this may not be too restrictive of a criterion, but when combined with the other attributes from the screen it becomes more difficult.

Especially when you consider the difficulties companies have faced since 2008. That time period alone culls many companies that were not able to stand up to the economic turmoil. In fact, I think it is a great reference for Value/Fundamental investors to have such a time period to hold as a measuring stick for companies.

If a company shows any negative earnings in the last ten-year time period the impression has been made. I will move on to the next one on the list.

Conversely, if the company has been positive for ten years, I now look at the trend line. A steady upward trend makes for predictable earnings and growth.

Too Much Defense?

This may seem harsh and too restrictive for most investors.

I will be honest; I need the entire margin I can get. If that means passing on a company that has had a down year or two, so be it. I would rather be really right once than sort of right twice.

You enterprising investors need not despair; Graham has left an out for you.

When it comes to stock selection for the enterprising investor Graham calls for “No deficit in the last five years.” This will open up the field quite a bit.

Feedback

I want some feedback from you…

Am I being too restrictive?

What do you use as a first impression when it comes to stock analysis?

Oh yea, the companies above: Coca-Cola and Ford.